Or
Perils* of Paul-ien**?
*NYTimes subscription required or use of your alloted limit:
(in lieu of scroll click) David Brooks ~ Building Better Secularist
**NFRY: reading in progress former(*) embedded in latter(**)
Rather than further annotate or embed links... (dot, dot, dot)
TBS(2 B S...) Fukuyama Strauss
2. ★Re-initialism★ / Mises...
/ Cultural
Threads are Fine. / Neo-Context ?
B. SHOCK
and AWE(UPDATE) /\ /, Give
'em a break! //, Mises...
/, Technical
Difficulties /?/, GOLEFT TV [!]
S. E A R C H : Flash
Back, Fast
Forward, Regime
Rhetoric Reply, Open Threads.
[or / of rawls ? P'op'e ?]
Showing posts with label Theology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theology. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Sunday, December 01, 2013
Too Random...
...Righty[!]
Knot 2 fraught with fraud'nfreud?
Freedom the foundation or fountainhead?
A stopped clock is right...
too undimention,
1* over infinity has left.
* poetic license in 3 or 4-D.
won over
**
knot exactly; 1/infinity= zorro?
But seriously to unpun one in particular, freedom over everything is the problem.
Freedom over everything equals nothing over physics.
12-2-13 (...)added and *reframed
** s/b standard mobius/infinity (Thought I had previously used one, not this one.)
Embedded links:(Not fully read.)
1. The Difficulty with Hegel
2. Hegel or Anti-Hegel
Fully Read and Reviewing:
The Hegel Myth and its Method: (Kaufmann 1959)Akin to Plato's Form(The Socratics of the Ideal and States)^
Selections:
"The writings of Hegel and Plato abound in admittedly one-sided statements that are clearly meant to formulate points of view that are then shown to be inadequate and are countered by another perspective. Thus an impressive quilt quotation could be patched together to convince gullible readers that Hegel was — depending on the “scholar’s” plans — either emphatically for or utterly opposed to, say, “equality.” But the understanding of Hegel would be advanced ever so much more by citing one of his remarks about equality in context, showing how it is a step in an argument that is designed to lead the reader to a better comprehension of equality and not to enlist his emotions either for it or against it."
"Hegel was rarely cited in the Nazi literature, and, when he was referred to, it was usually by way of disapproval. (...) Rosenberg also stressed, and excoriated, the “Socratic” elements in Plato."
References to 3D/4M@. English***, Math, Form~process.
*** generic word language/numbers as an ideal and a language/so-called results.
I do not necessarily want to break out of my understanding of Hegel, not say he would have understood it my way or anyone else's. But is Popper properly popped? Yet I do use a method of labelism/reference/progression-digression. The hazards of the Internet, not to mention old material, one might not recall running into sources before. I developed my tetrahedron courtesy of my older work on The Republic(1970~), delineating the mass-energy equivalence formula, and possibly Milo Wolff.(2004~)
In the above not yet reads, but glanced at's, they may have a point, and may be missing or pointing from their own point. I may yet to agree or disagree with them, but still appreciate or depreciate their points.
^ & ~ must be reviewed. "Dates~" note time of encounter.
12-3-13 (FP1) Have yet to locate "^". [rtd]
12-4-13 That's the ticket ! ?
But to tilt at swans?
12-9-13 Roughly 13 in rough.
12-10-13 Scientific American Dispute over Infinity Divides Mathematicians
verses RealClearPolitics Newtonian Government
Trinity Squared ?
Knot 2 fraught with fraud'nfreud?
Freedom the foundation or fountainhead?
A stopped clock is right...
too undimention,
1* over infinity has left.
* poetic license in 3 or 4-D.
won over
**knot exactly; 1/infinity= zorro?
But seriously to unpun one in particular, freedom over everything is the problem.
Freedom over everything equals nothing over physics.
12-2-13 (...)added and *reframed
** s/b standard mobius/infinity (Thought I had previously used one, not this one.)
Embedded links:(Not fully read.)
1. The Difficulty with Hegel
2. Hegel or Anti-Hegel
Fully Read and Reviewing:
The Hegel Myth and its Method: (Kaufmann 1959)Akin to Plato's Form(The Socratics of the Ideal and States)^
Selections:
"The writings of Hegel and Plato abound in admittedly one-sided statements that are clearly meant to formulate points of view that are then shown to be inadequate and are countered by another perspective. Thus an impressive quilt quotation could be patched together to convince gullible readers that Hegel was — depending on the “scholar’s” plans — either emphatically for or utterly opposed to, say, “equality.” But the understanding of Hegel would be advanced ever so much more by citing one of his remarks about equality in context, showing how it is a step in an argument that is designed to lead the reader to a better comprehension of equality and not to enlist his emotions either for it or against it."
"Hegel was rarely cited in the Nazi literature, and, when he was referred to, it was usually by way of disapproval. (...) Rosenberg also stressed, and excoriated, the “Socratic” elements in Plato."
References to 3D/4M@. English***, Math, Form~process.
*** generic word language/numbers as an ideal and a language/so-called results.
I do not necessarily want to break out of my understanding of Hegel, not say he would have understood it my way or anyone else's. But is Popper properly popped? Yet I do use a method of labelism/reference/progression-digression. The hazards of the Internet, not to mention old material, one might not recall running into sources before. I developed my tetrahedron courtesy of my older work on The Republic(1970~), delineating the mass-energy equivalence formula, and possibly Milo Wolff.(2004~)
In the above not yet reads, but glanced at's, they may have a point, and may be missing or pointing from their own point. I may yet to agree or disagree with them, but still appreciate or depreciate their points.
^ & ~ must be reviewed. "Dates~" note time of encounter.
12-3-13 (FP1) Have yet to locate "^". [rtd]
12-4-13 That's the ticket ! ?
But to tilt at swans?
12-9-13 Roughly 13 in rough.
12-10-13 Scientific American Dispute over Infinity Divides Mathematicians
verses RealClearPolitics Newtonian Government
Trinity Squared ?
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Friday, February 22, 2013
Future Bubble?
The gist is a pun on Future Shock. I was going to use Future Cushion, but here are three segments that seem to run with that theme.
A Conversation With Al Gore
The Interfaith Amigos On Death And Afterlife *
Michelle Rhee: A "Radical" On Education Reform
*I have only caught portions of the other two.
**(Ctrl F "rubric")
*** anachronistic ironic insert
(The theme? See labels.)***
[Missing Tangent.]
[Ironic Gotcha Journalism. Point Counter-Point(?)**]
[3rd asterisk from the bubble? Three links for which I wish I could track my original train of search, ergo? ergone? KNOT!]
[2-24-13 Rhee Test of Filter?]
A Conversation With Al Gore
The Interfaith Amigos On Death And Afterlife *
Michelle Rhee: A "Radical" On Education Reform
*I have only caught portions of the other two.
**(Ctrl F "rubric")
*** anachronistic ironic insert
(The theme? See labels.)***
[Missing Tangent.]
[Ironic Gotcha Journalism. Point Counter-Point(?)**]
[3rd asterisk from the bubble? Three links for which I wish I could track my original train of search, ergo? ergone? KNOT!]
[2-24-13 Rhee Test of Filter?]
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Tacky, tact, tack...
Who let the Dogfish* out?
Apology Cruise?
* not exactly [!]
Apology Cruise? First, a Dogfish is a shark and I must admit to participating in their demise as a fisherman. A billy-club or gaff hook is the tool of choice. Second, Akin to fishing trips or the Romney Embassy gaff is Juan Coles hook to "Jumping the Shark". Irony of Wrong Knees**, "legitimate rape" is almost long forgotten, what with the "empty chair" and the "Leder" Twain.
** I am not implying Right or Wrong, only Diploma See.^
^ of Right and Wrong
S.E. Cupp
Evan Kohlmann
[9-20-12: or non-Prof-etiq et tu? AM Clint 'n's Worlds?]
Apology Cruise?
* not exactly [!]
Apology Cruise? First, a Dogfish is a shark and I must admit to participating in their demise as a fisherman. A billy-club or gaff hook is the tool of choice. Second, Akin to fishing trips or the Romney Embassy gaff is Juan Coles hook to "Jumping the Shark". Irony of Wrong Knees**, "legitimate rape" is almost long forgotten, what with the "empty chair" and the "Leder" Twain.
** I am not implying Right or Wrong, only Diploma See.^
^ of Right and Wrong
S.E. Cupp
Evan Kohlmann
[9-20-12: or non-Prof-etiq et tu? AM Clint 'n's Worlds?]
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Long Story
Short : The Clash
Mission Impossible.
Not to 4close this post, but an earlier mental riff came on threes.
Third times a charm.
The third way.
Good/Bad things come in threes.
More often the latter.
And before I insert any links in this a4mentioned riff, here are four.
The Table
Republican Flip Flop
Machine Killing Medicare
The Mess I uh[?]
Oops!
Original In Tent.
(see MKM)*
Now 4 the 3.
Not only to note the passing in 3's,
but to bring it down a level,
not to be Dante'in,
but polarizing,
with Hitch'n the middle. **
* Geo Me Tricks
** not my original link to get to the Hitch
but as moderator of poles, or Czechs.
[update]
[not]
[or knot]
< previous post >
Mission Impossible.
Not to 4close this post, but an earlier mental riff came on threes.
Third times a charm.
The third way.
Good/Bad things come in threes.
More often the latter.
And before I insert any links in this a4mentioned riff, here are four.
The Table
Republican Flip Flop
Machine Killing Medicare
The Mess I uh[?]
Oops!
Original In Tent.
(see MKM)*
Now 4 the 3.
Not only to note the passing in 3's,
but to bring it down a level,
not to be Dante'in,
but polarizing,
with Hitch'n the middle. **
* Geo Me Tricks
** not my original link to get to the Hitch
but as moderator of poles, or Czechs.
[update]
[not]
[or knot]
< previous post >
Sunday, December 18, 2011
In the begining...
was the math. It was not good or evil. But as his story has it, it was the word good, minus an oh. But my ge oh me try, pertains to more recent Dawnings and Odysseys ... and our stories. Not to mention whose father's a mother, and the ChrisT of Chris(noT) and Christ of her and Try-Unism not mention ChrisTmass.
Alter'nate
(12-19-11 cont.)
(Efin language caution.)
i.e. Way overboard.**
The Tetra Heed Run and voo doo* [!]
* original wording: "and back again"
** ef fort or ef-troop
(If you are sensitive to fowl depictions, not to kill two birds...)
BTW C-Scroll [!]
Footnotes:
Iron
Knee
Con
Text
Try-Unism
Not to undermine whatever academics*** there R here,
but a spin of a thought of the boogie man found me this, and relevant cycles referred to in the punctuation of irony/sarcasm which is [!].
*** that's academic [?] [See Comments for serious footnotes.]
Context:
Mission Accomplished
"Reel Ledership" (sic)
Bottom line
The Tetra Heed Run (sic)
(sic) is for spelling sake.(no[!]t)
The last link is a bit weak on the economic reference to the "free market": as if it exists. Not that the tangents are not relevant, or what can be spun by mis-leding words, BTW.
P.S. as I sent this out, I titled an E-mail Narrative-ity.
[And I might note that I am not using "strict" framing ala Lakoff, but walking a plank of nurture.
No president is the Messiah, maybe the Mess I uh, but Obama is the un-messWe-in.]
P.P.S. No Idol Thoughts.
[Link added 12-20-11]
< previous post >
Alter'nate
(12-19-11 cont.)
(Efin language caution.)
i.e. Way overboard.**
The Tetra Heed Run and voo doo* [!]
* original wording: "and back again"
** ef fort or ef-troop
(If you are sensitive to fowl depictions, not to kill two birds...)
BTW C-Scroll [!]
Footnotes:
Iron
Knee
Con
Text
Try-Unism
Not to undermine whatever academics*** there R here,
but a spin of a thought of the boogie man found me this, and relevant cycles referred to in the punctuation of irony/sarcasm which is [!].
*** that's academic [?] [See Comments for serious footnotes.]
Context:
Mission Accomplished
"Reel Ledership" (sic)
Bottom line
The Tetra Heed Run (sic)
(sic) is for spelling sake.(no[!]t)
The last link is a bit weak on the economic reference to the "free market": as if it exists. Not that the tangents are not relevant, or what can be spun by mis-leding words, BTW.
P.S. as I sent this out, I titled an E-mail Narrative-ity.
[And I might note that I am not using "strict" framing ala Lakoff, but walking a plank of nurture.
No president is the Messiah, maybe the Mess I uh, but Obama is the un-messWe-in.]
P.P.S. No Idol Thoughts.
[Link added 12-20-11]
< previous post >
Saturday, December 17, 2011
The Tetra Heed Run
Of Iron Knee and flip-flop**.
I'd rather pin the tale on the Dawn Key,
than pull the knows off an elephant.
[Oops.]
Con Text : Fields Apart.
Joan asked "why is the the main qualification"
Hitchens: "I don't know."
That is just one loose brick in the difference between polemics and debate, which are not the only foundations of progress. There are limits to logic*, and Hitchens certainly pushes even those of reason.
It seems like the old saw on common sense.
NOT[!] I mean that in a mathematical sense.
* See "saw"
** Footnotes W, X, Y, Z [!]
*** I will let you jig for the Lakoff
[No pun intended on Admiral Perry. See Trip/Lex of Middle]
[All Labels Added 12-20-11]
I'd rather pin the tale on the Dawn Key,
than pull the knows off an elephant.
[Oops.]
Con Text : Fields Apart.
Joan asked "why is the the main qualification"
Hitchens: "I don't know."
That is just one loose brick in the difference between polemics and debate, which are not the only foundations of progress. There are limits to logic*, and Hitchens certainly pushes even those of reason.
It seems like the old saw on common sense.
NOT[!] I mean that in a mathematical sense.
* See "saw"
** Footnotes W, X, Y, Z [!]
*** I will let you jig for the Lakoff
[No pun intended on Admiral Perry. See Trip/Lex of Middle]
[All Labels Added 12-20-11]
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
In the begining
was the word
The word* was Exceptionalism.
So it goes.[**]
But that depends on what your definition of "it" is. I am just saying, it all depends on what your definition of "exceptionalism" is.
We are the greatest! But it depends on what your definition of "greatest" is. And so it stops for some or goes round and round.
Reality aside...a definitive follow up.
Speaking of mixing it up. "Why can't the president acknowledge the value of an unexpressed thought? Thank You Tucker Carlson on FOX!
P.S. Vikings over Vick!
[*] Tumulty
[**] see the irony of origins in the French connection.
[Re: Niching a will to labels or change?]
The word* was Exceptionalism.
So it goes.[**]
But that depends on what your definition of "it" is. I am just saying, it all depends on what your definition of "exceptionalism" is.
We are the greatest! But it depends on what your definition of "greatest" is. And so it stops for some or goes round and round.
Reality aside...a definitive follow up.
Speaking of mixing it up. "Why can't the president acknowledge the value of an unexpressed thought? Thank You Tucker Carlson on FOX!
P.S. Vikings over Vick!
[*] Tumulty
[**] see the irony of origins in the French connection.
[Re: Niching a will to labels or change?]
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Benoit Mandelbrot
May he RIP! Here's to nature. What about sythesis of competition and cooperation? Do we now have the 4 C's?
Nature is an Oxymoron
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
The Bully...
Poor Pit. Not to pull my R's upon my return from Japan, it does seem odd though, for billionaires(and corporations) for free speech not wanting their names known for fear of bullying. The pity is in the pendulum of victim hoods. Not to mention[*] the other slap shot at robustness.
[*]10-14-10 My sarcasm might be too subtle here, in that the Poor link(above) on Taleb's Robustness may be a slightly slanted perspective of economics from the business perspective. The Business Insider might be no more than a blog or astro bagger in terms of its criticism or incomprehesion of Taleb's theories. Taleb online The New Yorker under my usual meanderings. I would also suggest whether Bernanke has read Taleb or not, he should explain that there has not been a replacement for Keynesian economics, and that the government has a role to play or the balance will continue to teeter for the moneyed rather than the purposeful. On the other hand this may just be an incompresible way of saying that unless Taleb is understood and improved upon, we can suffice with continued tinkering as long as it is with purpose and for the people. Unfortunately this may be a bigger task than understanding Taleb. What I allude or have links here to, are the international and comprehensive nature of economics evolution. And simply put, the economy must not fall off the wall, but work on the wall must be comprehensive if not wholistic. If I may reiterate my tetrahedron of physics, psychology, philosophy and politics ofor purpose. The pinnacle of the project is the purpose of the structure and the process that works whatever is intended** to work.
** And I have not intentionally left "we" out of this, but it puts politics, religion and economics as part of the process not the purpose, or the be all and end all, intended or not.
[At the risk of further incomprehensiveness, I suggest that the administration is doing what it can short of a complete replacement of Keynesian economics, otherwise know as my Egg/Wall metaphor, while Taleb's approach may be just the thing as a goal. There are natural laws, and they must be worked with or they will be against us all. See tetrahedron not theology.]
[*]10-14-10 My sarcasm might be too subtle here, in that the Poor link(above) on Taleb's Robustness may be a slightly slanted perspective of economics from the business perspective. The Business Insider might be no more than a blog or astro bagger in terms of its criticism or incomprehesion of Taleb's theories. Taleb online The New Yorker under my usual meanderings. I would also suggest whether Bernanke has read Taleb or not, he should explain that there has not been a replacement for Keynesian economics, and that the government has a role to play or the balance will continue to teeter for the moneyed rather than the purposeful. On the other hand this may just be an incompresible way of saying that unless Taleb is understood and improved upon, we can suffice with continued tinkering as long as it is with purpose and for the people. Unfortunately this may be a bigger task than understanding Taleb. What I allude or have links here to, are the international and comprehensive nature of economics evolution. And simply put, the economy must not fall off the wall, but work on the wall must be comprehensive if not wholistic. If I may reiterate my tetrahedron of physics, psychology, philosophy and politics ofor purpose. The pinnacle of the project is the purpose of the structure and the process that works whatever is intended** to work.
** And I have not intentionally left "we" out of this, but it puts politics, religion and economics as part of the process not the purpose, or the be all and end all, intended or not.
[At the risk of further incomprehensiveness, I suggest that the administration is doing what it can short of a complete replacement of Keynesian economics, otherwise know as my Egg/Wall metaphor, while Taleb's approach may be just the thing as a goal. There are natural laws, and they must be worked with or they will be against us all. See tetrahedron not theology.]
Thursday, September 09, 2010
Belated...(HAPPY BIRTHDAY RMS!)
Congratulation on making it to your terrible two's.[updated link] I feel like a "birther" in having pushed your name and Ed's for MSNBC to match Faux News, although you match Comity* Central as well. In fact I almost admonished you for your "crossing the line", but I on second review of the rhetoric, it was not.** Here is to Bane or Change? You walk the line.
*SIC (spelling in Con/text)
** the Second Amendment Angle
[Third times a charm but not 'l's.(as in L's or spells)]
Chant... Bane(or)Change! Bane(or)Change! Bane(or)Change!
*SIC (spelling in Con/text)
** the Second Amendment Angle
[Third times a charm but not 'l's.(as in L's or spells)]
Chant... Bane(or)Change! Bane(or)Change! Bane(or)Change!
Wednesday, September 08, 2010
Speaking of Sarcasm
Opinion: Critics and Foreign Policy.
Will Imam Abdul Rauf be taken for his word?
A Cult Classic.
It seems that intolerance is a lack of faith, yet that does not mean that a minority is right. 'Nuff said? Well, intolerance should be opposed, but that is the paradox. Especially when the intolerant see the intolerance for intolerance and think they are about tolerance. If the vicious cycle cannot be seen, then check the definition of faith, especially in one's own beliefs.
Will Imam Abdul Rauf be taken for his word?
A Cult Classic.
It seems that intolerance is a lack of faith, yet that does not mean that a minority is right. 'Nuff said? Well, intolerance should be opposed, but that is the paradox. Especially when the intolerant see the intolerance for intolerance and think they are about tolerance. If the vicious cycle cannot be seen, then check the definition of faith, especially in one's own beliefs.
Friday, September 03, 2010
In Balance...
Re: prized.
I thought McClatchy was a reliable publication, but I want to be careful not to think different based on one article or journalist.(or 2) Another reportedly reputable source (FiveThirtyEight)may have more perspective or less*.
*not to dis one or the other article or source but: Reputable is in the eye of the beholder, reliable is in the light of reality. We shall see.
[SEE Comment:(*...*) speaking of sources... a flip-flop. See The Blaze and the "Stand."]
[Or I could be lost in the media error that:
Obama = Black Liberation Theology = Catholic Liberation History And BINGO!
The problem is the fullness of Obama's Christianity.
(OK, this is my paraphrase and progression, but technically accurate.)
[Pre date and update. Happy Labor Day!]
(*...*)Notes major segue: from first comment to second, as the "he" in latter is Glenn Beck, which represents leap from Glenn Beck's famous trinity to actual justice in our society.
I thought McClatchy was a reliable publication, but I want to be careful not to think different based on one article or journalist.(or 2) Another reportedly reputable source (FiveThirtyEight)may have more perspective or less*.
*not to dis one or the other article or source but: Reputable is in the eye of the beholder, reliable is in the light of reality. We shall see.
[SEE Comment:(*...*) speaking of sources... a flip-flop. See The Blaze and the "Stand."]
[Or I could be lost in the media error that:
Obama = Black Liberation Theology = Catholic Liberation History And BINGO!
The problem is the fullness of Obama's Christianity.
(OK, this is my paraphrase and progression, but technically accurate.)
[Pre date and update. Happy Labor Day!]
(*...*)Notes major segue: from first comment to second, as the "he" in latter is Glenn Beck, which represents leap from Glenn Beck's famous trinity to actual justice in our society.
Thursday, September 02, 2010
As the Inner Tubes
Move me...
speaking of spirit or editing/updating/searching*...
Nuf(f) said?** (link added and spell checked)
* I was going to use a brand name for "searching",but will try to use natural verbs or nouns, like tissue not Kl**nex.
[and in my "searching" for "discipline" I brought up a missing link in more than one way.
**(I really did not know where I had employed the term (nuff said) earlier, when I employed it here.]
[but if I may coin: Inner Tubes above.]
speaking of spirit or editing/updating/searching*...
Nuf(f) said?** (link added and spell checked)
* I was going to use a brand name for "searching",but will try to use natural verbs or nouns, like tissue not Kl**nex.
[and in my "searching" for "discipline" I brought up a missing link in more than one way.
**(I really did not know where I had employed the term (nuff said) earlier, when I employed it here.]
[but if I may coin: Inner Tubes above.]
Wednesday, September 01, 2010
Running Thoughts
PC v. PP
Peace Culture v. Power Points?
{"stand in the burning bush"}*
[Turning the Page]
[Honoring the Message]
Almost 'nuff said...(dot,dot,dot)
*post comment link inserted(not to agree with the theology)But note the possible separation of spiritual and material, the church and state, and reality of subjective and objective.
Peace Culture v. Power Points?
{"stand in the burning bush"}*
[Turning the Page]
[Honoring the Message]
Almost 'nuff said...(dot,dot,dot)
*post comment link inserted(not to agree with the theology)But note the possible separation of spiritual and material, the church and state, and reality of subjective and objective.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)